PARALLELS TO THE CONCEPT OF 4GW IN INTEGRALISM
The concept of 4th Generation Warfare (4GW), as espoused by William S. Lind, has many similarities to the Integralist model, with some differences.
4GW is a concept focused on war, while Integralism is a holistic or all-inclusive Cultural system. (Culture is here defined as the integrated sum total or synthesis of a group’s spiritual, moral, political, and social concerns).
The three-tiered model from the work of Boyd (Physical, Mental, Moral), is more accurately reflected in the three faculties of human Cognition (Body: Material, Life: Emotional, and Mind: Conceptual).
The correlation between the Physical and Material is clear. When Lind references the Mental level in Boyd’s model, he is clearly referring to a Vital or Emotional response. T.he Moral level is a limited frame for the Conceptual level, valid in this context.
In regards to Tactics, Operations, and Strategy – when you add Diplomacy to this group (as Kiersey does in his model of personality) – this model corresponds to the four Essential Aspect Functions (Manipulation (Tactical), Mediation (Diplomatic), Observation (Strategic), and Operation (Operational). These four Functions must interdependently support each other in a successful endeavor.
Furthermore, Boyd’s OODA model is entirely superseded by the eight Aspect Modes. Rather than Observe, Orient, Decide and Act, four concurrent choices are made before implementation: Articulate vs Associate, Execute vs Examine, Regulate vs Adopt, and Replicate vs Adapt. These four pairs of modes present a choice sequence that allows one to effectively made a decision, and basically match the O-O-D-A sequence.
On the surface, the Aspect Divisions seem to be missing from the 4GW model, yet they are alluded to in several passages, at least partly through references to conventional warfare systemology:
Loosely – “Outward Focus” corresponds to the Aspect Division: Reconciliation. “De-Escalation Emphasis” corresponds to Conservation, “Decentrialization of Authority and Intelligence” to Regulation, “Accuracy” and “Proportionality of Response” to Correction.
Using the Essential Aspects, and the Integral systemology to fuse and evaluate models will all the Culture of the future to finally emerge, and this is just one example of a situation in which many close parallels exist.